Still more lazy thoughts from this one…

31 Days of Oscar – Recant This! Recasting Oscar’s Picks: the 00s


Bloggers PaulaKellee, and Aurora are in the final days of another successful online event. The 31 Days of Oscar Blogathon. The goal set is to get down in writing any and everything on film and Oscar for those participating. The following is the last of my blathering (or is it blithering?) on the subject.


In two days time, all the conjectures from entertainment professionals and amateurs, insiders and out, will be settled when Sunday’s 85th Academy Awards presentation takes place. And if we’ve learned anything from this exercise, it is that people care what the results are.


Holding sway on what we’re suppose to acknowledge as the final word on cinematic accomplishment. Think about that. The show is now watched worldwide. People from all over the globe will cheer their favorites on… and some of them will even win.

Of course, the reactions you’ll hear come in a wider and ever-growing variety of languages when the voting membership invariably blows a call or two. And we all know they will. So, let’s review some and rectify the naughty 00s as we wrap up this series. I know people will disagree with me on some or all of these, but where is the fun if we agree on everything? Drum roll, please:

2000 Best Actress


A funny thing happened along the way to Julia Roberts’ coronation for Erin Brockovich. She got out-classed by someone older, one that didn’t fit Hollywood’s young and beautiful criterion. And in a much riskier work, too. The downer film extraordinaire, Darren Aronofsky’s Requiem for a Dream. I remain a fan of Steven Soderbergh, though. And this was a nice showcase for Roberts. But compared to Ellen Burstyn’s powerful, supreme performance, Julia needed more than mere figure augmentation to get anywhere close to Ms. Burstyn’s achievement. Since the invitations and place-cards were already printed, come Hell or High Water, The Academy was picking Roberts. No matter if the truly deserving got ignored in the process. It wouldn’t be the last time in this span for Aronofsky and an actor of his.

2000 Best Director


Yeah, we’ll come to 2005 and its knotty issue soon enough. Besides they’re busy turning a blind eye to Christopher Nolan nowadays.

J.D. will disagree, but this should not have happened. I much admire Steven Soderbergh (and will find it a tremendous loss if Side Effects is truly his last big screen film). He has many great films to his credit (Out of Sight, The Limey, etc.). Still, I don’t think Traffic was his best or even the best in 2000. And it’s a remake of a superior British TV miniseries, at that. A trend that reared its head in earnest for studios as the millennium turned. The Best Director should have come from the worthy pair of filmmakers Oscar has made a hobby of ignoring. Either Ridley Scott for Gladiator or Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon‘s Ang Lee.

2001 Best Actor

MV5BMTY4OTMxNzg4NV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwNzI2NTE3._V1._SX485_SY727_Since I would have picked Denzel Washington for Malcolm X in the previous decade (or if the voting members would have selected him for 1999’s The Hurricane), then we’d have avoided this make-up call. It would not have happened, I assure you. Don’t get me wrong, watching Denzel go against character and play the dastardly Alonzo Harris in Training Day was entertaining as Hell. But, everyone and their mother rightly thought Russell Crowe should have won this year for A Beautiful Mind.

2001 Best Director

ridley-scott-directs-columbias-black-hawk-236948But, what I give with one hand, I take from the other. As much as I enjoyed A Beautiful Mind, I wouldn’t have given Ron Howard this. I would have awarded it to Ridley Scott. One could argue he was robbed the previous year for Gladiator (which won for Best Picture, by the way). That would be a make-up call under that reasoning. Yet, I’d say he qualified by successfully directing and delivering an extraordinary film adaptation in Black Hawk Down. The source being one of the most startling and insightful chronicles of modern warfare written, Mark Bowden’s real-life account of the Battle of Mogadishu. A book I regularly recommend. One I’d thought would be too difficult to translate to the screen. An assumption Ridley proved wrong.

2002 Best Actress


Going against type (see Denzel above), or against looks (see Charlize Theron) causes the voting members to swoon, or to go into vapor lock. Too bad. So, when Nicole Kidman wears a facial appendage… well, you know the rest. I would have given this to Salma Hayek for her fierce Frida, or Julianne Moore for Far From Heaven. Sorry Nicole fans, but she wasn’t even the best actress in The Hours cast.

2002 Best Picture


BTW, I do love Fosse’s stage play, Chicago; I just hate it that a hack like Marshall seems to get credit for this.

If you recall my post covering the 70’s, then you should have seen this one coming. Sorry — strike that, I’m not sorry — but I don’t count ripping off Bob Fosse as a reason to award their highest to Chicago. I hear they’re re-assembling its cast for this Sunday’s broadcast, along with most of The Avengers. Justice would demand a Hulk-style thumping of those involved. But that’s just me ;-). Thankfully, they didn’t give the director’s Oscar to Rob Marshall back then. All the other nominees were better. But the best episode of the trilogy was the Best Picture that year, Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. Anything but Chicago!

2005 Best Picture


The elephant in the room. I’m sure there are a number of readers fully expecting me to rail to the heavens about the “travesty” of Crash beating Brokeback Mountain at the 78th Academy Awards. Not going to happen. Yes, this was an unlikely film to see nominated, or win. But it touched upon the continuing thorny issue of race in America. I think the reverberations of Crash, its affect on viewers, what it declared aloud and our reactions to it, said a lot about us. The Academy surprised by doing something not safe. I recommend reading Damon Carter’s piece and T., The Focused Filmographer’s Future Classic Movie’s contribution for their absorbing thoughts on the decade’s cause célèbre. While I would have gone with Good Night, and Good Luck for best in ’05, I could see Brokeback winning. Although, it too wasn’t perfect. And Crash was not the corruption of the system many ranted about. There, I said it.

2006 Best Director

eastwood_lettersI believe I’ve made the case Martin Scorsese should have picked up a director’s award in the 80s and/or the 90s. Add The Departed to that long list of make-up calls by the voting block. This wasn’t even close to being Scorsese’s best work — more of a rehash of things he’s done before, this time set in Boston. And I don’t care if he needle dropped the Stone’s Gimme Shelter yet again, into the film. I’ve seen better from Marty. Who then? Clint Eastwood for his remarkable effort with Letters from Iwo Jima.

2006 Best Picture


I enjoyed The Departed, kinda. They dragged it out some and Nicholson was too much into ‘Jack‘ mode, for my taste. Truthfully, it was a remake of what I considered a superior (and shorter) Hong Kong crime thriller, Infernal Affairs. Kinda galling, too, the studio and Scorsese kept mum for the longest The Departed was actually that. Sadly, this was a pretty naked attempt to correct the mistakes done upon him. Really, I’m not picking on Marty. This wasn’t the best, Letters from Iwo Jima was.

2006 Best Animated Picture

cars-movie-vintage-speedTwo words: Happy Feet. This beats a Pixar film?!? Dancing vs. singing penguins? Huh. I guess we were not supposed to notice those singing were also dancing. Inane. Pixar-fatigue may explain this. Cars was arguably the studio’s weakest. It was still better than any of the entries in a poor field, though (Monster House, anyone?). Yes, an unlikely story. But an original and nostalgic look back to this region’s car culture. I hear the groans out there. Still superior to those damn penguins, I’d say (plus, it had Paul Newman voicing Doc Hudson, for chrissakes).

2008 Best Picture

Michael ClaytonI know it followed the book closely. A faithful adaptation, yes. And No Country For Old Men was absolutely outstanding… for ¾ of its runtime. Perhaps, I don’t get Cormac McCarthy’s concept, or I have an issue with films that don’t end strongly… or, at all. Though it didn’t have a scene-stealing sociopath with a Beatles mop cut in it, Michael Clayton didn’t suffer from this. In actuality, Tony Gilroy’s film started well and simply kept getting better and better as it went along. While Fargo was supremely underrated and lost, No Country was overrated and won. Michael Clayton should have.

2009 Best Actor


Two extraordinary actor performances bookended the decade for Darren Aronofsky. Both lost. A perfect storm (no, not the mediocre Wolfgang Petersen film from 2000) brewed and engulfed those who caught it in ’09. The Academy somehow missed the gale. Filmmaker, story, and actor came together to create another exceptional performance. I think any good actor could have replaced that year’s pick, Sean Penn, and Milk would have remained a very good film. However, I submit nobody other than Mickey Rourke could have played the lead in The Wrestler. Without him, it’s an interesting story, maybe just fair. Only an actor with the personal history, talent, and gravitas Rourke brought to the role made the film what it was. Years from now, it’ll be his performance (and Ellen Burstyn’s) people will look back on and wonder,

“What the hell was The Academy thinking?”

25 Responses to “31 Days of Oscar – Recant This! Recasting Oscar’s Picks: the 00s”

  1. ckckred

    I disagree with you on No Country For Old Men and The Departed and in 2001 would have given Best Director to David Lynch for Mulholland Drive (which I think should have been nominated for Best Picture and won), but I completely agree with Crash and Chicago. Nice post.


    • le0pard13

      That’s quite alright, ckckred. I recognize not everyone is going to agree with me, especially with those two films. That’s also a great pick for David Lynch for ‘Mulholland Drive’. I do remain a fan of that one, for sure. Many thanks for the comment and the read, my friend.


  2. Fogs' Movie Reviews

    This has been a great series, El Gato. Seriously, some fun reads.

    The one that I agree with the most here is Mickey Rourke for The Wrestler. There’s no doubt. I think we should file a protest or something. The man got robbed.

    You’re absolutely off of your rocker though suggesting Michael Clayton should have beat No Country for Old Men, though. LOL. That’s… out there bro. 😀 Easily the most off base you’ve been through this whole series! 😉


    • le0pard13

      Very kind of you to say, Fogs. And we aim to please (or drive people crazy) around here with my Oscar changes ;-). Especially when they’re ‘out there’ or ‘off base’ :-). Thanks so much for chiming in on each of the decades covered, my friend. Much appreciated.

      p.s., when the Coen Bros. pull a George Lucas and re-craft ‘No Country for Old Men’s ending, be sure to call me up ;-). Ha!


  3. Morgan R. Lewis

    Once again, a great post.

    As before, there aren’t a lot of areas where I’ve seen enough to make a call personally. I liked Chicago, but I’ll agree that it wasn’t the best picture — I would have given it to Gangs of New York that year. On The Lord of the Rings, I have a hard time saying which is the best of the three (though Two Towers is the only one that isn’t currently my “best of the year” for the year it’s in). I always felt that Return of the King won for the sake of the trilogy, though. Not saying it didn’t deserve it on its own, just saying it was obvious what the Oscars were going to do from the moment Fellowship got nominated.

    I thought The Departed was a great film. Don’t really care about it being a remake of an obscure Asian film; it’s very obviously it’s own thing anyway, as it’s steeped in Boston culture, which I’m going to bet Infernal Affairs wasn’t. I haven’t seen the competition, so I can’t say it absolutely deserved to win… but I will say this didn’t feel like a “makeup Oscar”. This was a film that could legitimately be expected to win on its own.

    Haven’t seen Michael Clayton, but I thank you for ousting No Country For Old Men. “3/4 of a good movie” is exactly how I feel about it. That anti-climactic ending takes it from 5-star territory to 3-star.


    • le0pard13

      Great to have you in on this 90s segment, Morgan. I very much enjoyed ‘Gangs of New York’. In point of fact, I enjoyed Daniel Day Lewis performance in it (where he lost) much more than his ‘There Will Be Blood’ role, where he won. I’d agree, too, ‘Return of the King’ won for the sake of the trilogy.

      ‘The Departed’ certainly has its fans. I don’t hold that against them. Yeah, Infernal Affairs is an obscure Asian film here in the U.S. — but not in Asia, or to fans of Asian film. Perhaps, my reaction to Scorsese’s version of it is tied to having seen his gangster films all the way back to ‘Mean Streets’ in ’73, everything thing in-between, and his growth with the genre. I just think compared to ‘Goodfellas’ and ‘Casino’, ‘The Departed’ comes up lacking. Many don’t, though.

      I do very much recommend ‘Michael Clayton’ to you, Morgan. And, oh…

      “That anti-climactic ending takes it from 5-star territory to 3-star.”

      … is spot-on with regards to ‘Old Country for Old Men’. Many thanks, my friend.


      • Morgan R. Lewis

        With Infernal Affairs/The Departed, I figure it’s probably a Magnificent Seven Samurai situation. They can both be very good films, but the difference in cultural idioms results in them being very different films even though the core story is essentially the same.

        And I’m just glad I’m not alone on NCFOM. Especially since Fogs and I get into it with each other about it quite a bit. 😀


  4. mummbles

    You make some very good points but I seems to disagree with some of these a tad more than the other posts you have done like this. Perhaps more time is needed. The ones I do agree with: Rourke, Cars (I liked Monster House quite a bit!), Two Towers, and a few more. thanks for the post


    • le0pard13

      That’s quite alright, mummbles. I love to hear the disagreements and the thoughts behind them. Please come back and share them. Always welcome here. Thank you very much, my friend.


  5. Paula

    Oh man…you have definitely highlighted some seriously poor decisions…I’d forgotten that CHICAGO won for Best Picture. Yikes. Although BROKEBACK was excellent, I’m fine with CRASH winning (i watched it because that exact post from T!) . I liked THE DEPARTED but yeah, Scorsese winning was a make up call. I think it is you who said they’ll do the same thing in 10 years with Christopher Nolan? Amen to that


  6. Le

    Crash was probably the biggest polemic last decade. I myself have tried to watch it, but couldn’t go on. It was some years ago, but it still doesn’t sound like my kind of film. Even Jack Nicholson was surprised when he annound Crash as the winner!


    • le0pard13

      Indeed. CRASH does have a distinct tenor. And I do remember Jack’s response that year. Thanks very much for the read and the comment.


  7. Aurora

    Again…another outstanding post. And again, I agree with most of what you note. My favorite line – “Sorry Nicole fans, but she wasn’t even the best actress in The Hours cast.” So true. Not deserved in comparison to competition.

    Must also agree on CRASH. Thought I was the only one who thought the right film won there.

    Finally. “Happy Feet” gives me agita.

    That is all.

    Wonderful stuff!



    • le0pard13

      It really is great to hear that others shared similar thoughts regarding ‘CRASH’.

      “Finally. “Happy Feet” gives me agita.”

      Love it. Simply, love that comment, Aurora. Keep ’em coming, my friend. Thank you very much.


  8. Eric @ The Warning Sign

    Well done again, Michael. Some bold picks in here, too. The two I most agree with are Ellen Burstyn and Mickey Rourke — two of the best performances from the last decade, period, and it’s embarrassing that they did not win.


    • le0pard13

      I do try to be bold on occasion ;-). Thank you very much for the kind thoughts and following this series (and the blog), Eric. Much appreciated.


  9. ianthecool

    You make a lot of good changes. I think many would agree with you. I like that you chose Scott for Black Hawk Down. That is a great example of how to direct action.


    • le0pard13

      So true. Ridley really some wonderful and artful direction in many scenes in ‘Black Hawk Down’. It wasn’t you typical war film. Many thanks, Ian.



Are you talkin’ to me?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: