Still more lazy thoughts from this one…

Apollo 13 Film Review

apollo 13Timing is everything. I don’t think my partner, the blogger otherwise known as the Scientist Gone Wordy, in this literary and cinema review series of ours foresaw what was scheduled at this year’s TCM Classic Film Festival1. Or knew that the Hollywood event was moved up from its usual April to this month when she proposed the year’s timetable for the titles we’d examine back on January 1st.

If she did, she’s more psychic than the woman I’m married to.

Scary thought as Ron Howard’s film adaptation of the 1994 non-fiction book by astronaut Jim Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger, Lost Moon, was showcased at the festival in the famed Chinese Theatre last Friday. Wasn’t about to miss that screening since the year also marked the 20th anniversary of the film’s release in ’95. Read the source material in preparation, too.

As usual, my colleague Rachel will examine and review the historical book that tracked the perilous voyage of Apollo 13. One that enthralled the world as a result of a hidden technical failure that could have led to catastrophe in space. Its later translation into a tense and spectacular film is what I’ll evaluate. The wordy one’s book review can be found here:

Lost Moon by Jim Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger

A brief synopsis of the film: On April 11, 1970, at 1313 Houston time, during the post-heyday of the Apollo space program, astronauts Jim Lovell, Jack Haise, and Jack Swigert are sent on America’s fifth mission to the moon. The unlucky 13th of the program. Only fifty-five hours into the flight, after a broadcast home and a routine stirring of the tanks, disaster took place. A mysterious explosion rocked the command capsule, draining away its oxygen and power.

Commander Lovell and his crew watch in alarm as the cockpit grows darker, the air thinner, and the instruments wink out one by one. Luckily, the lunar module that was to land on the moon, undamaged but never built for what the astronauts intend, will be forced into service as their only lifeboat in the vacuum of space. What unfolds is the true story of the astronauts and NASA personnel at Houston laboring to return the spacecraft and crew safely to Earth.

[spoiler warning: some key elements of the film could be revealed in this review]

NASA Director: “This could be the worst disaster NASA’s ever faced.”
Gene Kranz: “With all due respect, sir, I believe this is gonna be our finest hour.”

You get to a certain age and some things aren’t recalled as sharply. The good and the bad. Then there are those that still are because they were shared collectively. Remain vivid, in fact. My entire generation was raised as youngsters during the inception of the space program. Captivated by its step-by-careful-step progressions and successes, marked by infrequent, and for the most part, unseen failures. Made 13’s almost as momentous as that first walk on the moon.


Distinctly remember when it was announced that the precarious mission of Apollo 13 was to be chronicled on film. Instantly excited was I…then, worried. Could filmmakers do the real-life misadventure of its fraught voyage home any justice, I wondered. Director Ron Howard’s work I’d enjoyed (Splash, Cocoon, Night Shift), now tempered with later productions like Willow, Backdraft, Far and Away I found less so. I needn’t have worried, though.

Often compared to The Right Stuff (reviewed last year) with its historical significance and succession from the early Mercury program, it’d be a natural for a TCM movie double-bill. Those who’ve seen Philip Kaufman’s ’83 epic will spot director Ron Howard pretty much attempted to model most of Apollo 13 around that film — Gus Grissom’s ill-fated pre-launch test for the Apollo 1 mission his film’s blunt lead-in. Just as Lovell and Kluger expounded in their book.

apollo 13 08Even so, the two films (like their sources) share little else beyond that, outwardly. Tom Wolfe’s telling The Right Stuff, which director Kaufman translated so well to cinema, was for the most part a poetically Earth-bound one. The thoroughness and technical precision of Howard’s adaptation places it more toward the thriller category with its shorter span…sans gravity. Another reason this film splashed down in the midst of the summer blockbuster season, I think.

No doubt, the irony and parallels for those of us who saw John Sturges’ Marooned (1969) a mere four months before Lovell’s final Saturn 5 liftoff, obviously was not lost on Universal Studio executives twenty-five years later. Apollo 13‘s tale filled with extraordinary suspense and misfortune to fuel such a cinematic effort. Perchance, ample enough to have those same execs to contemplate how they’d tie the real event to some inane sequel. Apollo 18 anyone?

No matter.

“We’ve never lost an American in space, we’re sure as hell not gonna lose one on my watch! Failure is not an option.”

Its film adaptation proved an immediate commercial success upon release. Clearly, filmmakers combined elements most go to the movies for — drama, comedy, suspense, thrills, and tug of the heart. After reading “Lost Moon” I’ve come to appreciate the William Broyles Jr. and Al Reinert screenplay the more. Given the archival detail Lovell and Kluger documented, getting a good portion of it into a 140-minute movie was its own remarkable feat.

“All right, we’re not doing this, gentlemen. We are *not* going to do this. We’re not going to go bouncing off the walls for ten minutes, ’cause we’re just going to end up back here with the same problems! Try to figure out how to stay alive!”

Of course, this being Hollywood, some facets had to change. Given the central theme of the 2015 TCM Classic Film Festival was “History According to Hollywood”, Apollo 13 (among others) proved “…endless inspiration in re-creating historical moments and bringing to life the heroes and villains of the past…” Though, “…not always true to the historical record…” The histrionic aspects involving both Mattingly and Swigert taking most of the artistic license here.

apollo 13 crew

Once again, it doesn’t really matter.

Yes, yes. I’ve become somewhat jaundice toward the splurge of overly CGI’d film in the years since.

What Ron Howard and Imagine Entertainment co-founder Brian Grazer crafted simply works. As a popular movie, and in capturing a heroic moment of our storied past on celluloid. Granted, in twenty years some of its special effects, the models and computers of Rob Legato’s Digital Domain Inc., can be spotted. Even though a splendid restoration premiered at this year’s fest. Their fine contribution fulfilled the promise of any contemporary blockbuster, I must say.

The mission launch sequence even now thrills this jaded moviegoer to tears as it first did long ago. Says something of how well the film still connects with its audience, even if many of them were not yet born when the Odyssey lost power in-between Earth and its moon. The standing ovation those of us in the TCL Chinese Theatre gave that night for the spry 87-year-old Jim Lovell, introduced by Alex Trebeck (with surprise guest Bill Paxton), a testament to that.


Watching this for the umpteenth time, noting a number of details and references from the book skillfully pieced together, scattered throughout the final product, still gave pause. The film has become even more evocative for those of us who’ve followed our country’s space program from its genesis to today. For we have lost gallant crews in the years after April 1970. The Space Shuttle Challenger on its ascent, and Columbia on the tragic descent2.

Apollo 13, like its real-life counterparts, an extraordinary entity translated to the screen. Whether a viewer catches it at home, or better yet, in a glorious theater. The ensemble cast of well-known names (Tom Hanks, Ed Harris, Kevin Bacon, The Pax Man, Kathleen Quinlan, Gary Sinise) and character actors (among them Clint Howard making another appearance in a brother Ron production), pulling together and engineering like Hell to bring it all home3.


Lastly but most assuredly, Hans Zimmer’s stirring score befitted the history screened. Especially when the haunting trumpet solo of the main theme, beautifully evoked by Tim Morrison, marked time. Added a euphonic weight across the ancient monitors, gauges, and slide rules of those figuring out a way to cheat death once more in humankind’s reach for the stars. Just another of the film’s noble aspects bestowed on viewers.

A sample of the warmth played out against all that cold nothingness as a prodigious problem was solved.

Reporter: “Apollo 13 – lifting off at 1300 hours and 13 minutes, and, entering the moon’s gravity on April 13th.”
Jim Lovell: “Uh, Ken Mattingly has been doing some… scientific experiments regarding that very phenomenon, haven’t you?”
Ken Mattingly: “Well, uh, yes, well I uh, had a black cat walk over a broken mirror under the lunar module ladder, didn’t seem to be a problem.”

Parallel Post Series

  1. The wonderful event I try to attend every year. 
  2. Scenes where Mission Control members argue to reveal all they know to Odyssey’s crew today standout. Jack Swigert’s contention Houston was intentionally keeping them in the dark with, “And what if they had made a mistake, all right? And there was no way to reverse it, you think they would tell us? There’s no reason for them to tell us!”, has gained an eerie reference to what happened with the 2003 Columbia mission. 
  3. “Howard went to great lengths to create a technically accurate movie, employing NASA‘s technical assistance in astronaut and flight controller training for his cast, and even obtaining permission to film scenes aboard a reduced gravity aircraft for realistic depiction of the “weightlessness” experienced by the astronauts in space.” ~ Wikipedia 

26 Responses to “Apollo 13 Film Review”

  1. ruth

    I really need to rewatch this one, such a great cast and an excellent space movie. More importantly, I also need to watch The Right Stuff! Great review as always, my friend!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Rachel

    Actually I am psychic, now if I could only know which bits I was predicting and which were lucky guesses. 😉 I was thrilled to see the coincidence and assumed you would be at the festival. Very cool.

    I hadn’t watched this one since I originally saw it in the theatre so it was great to see it again. I really loved reading the book before the re-screening as it added a lot to the movie experience and helped me to catch the “easter eggs” throughout the film.

    I, too, grew weary of the idea that a back-up astronaut was somehow a lesser astronaut and might not actually know how to do the job. I mean, seriously! I know gov’t agencies can be silly at times but back-up just means later on the roster not some random from the support crew. Hundreds upon thousands of hours are spent training for actions in space and no one is going up who doesn’t deserve it. Sheez!

    But even the tiny annoyances can’t detract from what a great film it is. Such a great historical event to honor and a real life thriller that showcases amazing talent. A really good time!

    Thanks so much for suggesting this one and the great review. I loved it!

    I adore Willow.

    Liked by 1 person

    • le0pard13

      I knew it! You and my wife. Well, I must attract that somehow. The Eagles certainly understand that. 😉

      We surely agree on this one. Reading the LOST MOON only enhanced my experience again with the film, as well. And yeah, that “back-up astronaut” premise, though nicely dramatic and entertaining, comes across a bit silly if you know what actually occurred. Still, overall, a truly enjoyable film from one of the most harrowing true-life events of the space program.

      Really glad we did this, and that you picked the perfect month to have this on the docket. Now why did I suspect you adored WILLOW? Hmm… To set the record straight, I like that Ron Howard film. Though for me, it isn’t as good on this film. Just saying. 🙂

      Thank you, Rachel!


  3. Richard

    Great review. This movie came out almost 20 years ago, so going in I was a bit worried the movie wouldn’t hold up effects wise. And that I had been spoiled by the recent space movies such as Gravity, Star Trek, or even Man of Steel. While technology has come a long way since 1995, I think Apollo 13 does hold up.

    Liked by 1 person

    • le0pard13

      Thank you very much and welcome, Richard. APOLLO 13 held up extremely well through two decades, surely. Had a great time seeing it again on the big screen at The Chinese Theatre. Fantastic venue for the film, and the appreciation it received. Certainly, with Jim Lovell and Bill Paxton in attendance. Really somethin’!


  4. jackdeth72

    Hi, Michael and Wordy:

    Ron Howard put together a great, well detail and superbly executed ensemble pieces of the 1990s. A taut, crisp screenplay allows all involved their moments to shine. Especially Ed Harris, Joe Spano and Bill Paxton.

    You can’t fake “Zero G”. Where all the filming inside the “Vomit Comet” pays for itself with change to spare.

    High marks for the launch and its “Lox Ice” avalanche and a dejected Gary Sinise watching in the distance.

    Very nicely done!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Tom

    You’ve totally encapsulated all that I love about this film.

    “Houston, we have a problem.” May that be a line that marks a feat of cinematic writing. And that lift-off sequence, I’m always in awe of it as it truly captures mankind’s relentless pursuit of curiosity and perhaps the more incredible ability we have to actually go about accruing more knowledge about our environments.

    This is one of my favorite movies of all time, there is no doubt about it.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Apollo 13 (1995) | 100 Films in a Year

    […] What the Public Say “filmmakers combined elements most go to the movies for — drama, comedy, suspense, thrills, and tug of the heart. After reading Lost Moon I’ve come to appreciate the William Broyles Jr. and Al Reinert screenplay the more. Given the archival detail Lovell and Kluger documented, getting a good portion of it into a 140-minute movie was its own remarkable feat.” — le0pard13, It Rains… You Get Wet […]

    Liked by 1 person


Are you talkin’ to me?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: