Still more lazy thoughts from this one…

Brokeback Mountain Film Review

brokeback mountainAs we’ve restarted our duo post series for the year, it’s good to be back in the saddle again, as Gene Autry would say. If you’re new to this, that’s when the blogger otherwise known as the Scientist Gone Wordy and I examine literary and cinema material that share an interconnection. My colleague Rachel will examine and review the source text later adapted to film, which I’ll evaluate. It’s not like castrating sheep, I assure you.

Every so often, because it’s February, we take up a story that is romantic in nature (given my wife and I celebrated Valentine’s Day, and our wedding anniversary, this same month). Today the wordy one peruses a notable short story by the journalist-author Annie Proulx. Her momentous tale, Brokeback Mountain, originally published by The New Yorker on October 13, 1997, was the basis for its 2005 film adaptation that I’ll broach. Rachel’s book review can be found here:

Brokeback Mountain by Annie Proulx

A brief synopsis of the film: In Wyoming’s short warm season, two young men (Ennis Del Mar and Jack Twist) are joined up by sheep rancher Joe Aguirre in 1963 to watch over a couple thousand head of sheep as they pasture up on Brokeback Mountain. Primarily, one bedding down with the flock each night to protect them from predators for the summer. Cold, laborious, and lonesome work in the high country for the ranch hand Ennis and the aspiring rodeo rider Jack. One night after drinking, Jack invites Ennis to come into his tent for warmth. The close bond that has developed suddenly erupts into a passionate sexual and emotional relationship. Complicating everything that each has held on to this point in their young lives. Knowing full well it’s dangerous to be in the midst of what they can’t speak openly of. For it’s Wyoming…in ’63.

[spoiler warning: some key elements of the film could be revealed in this review]

“There ain’t never enough time, never enough…”

Ten years this summer. A lot has changed since this film debuted in 2005 at the Telluride Film Festival. Arguably, because it was. Reading Pulitzer-winning writer Annie Proulx’s reaction last year to the well-regarded adaptation of her story I was surprised to learn it had become one of regret. Meaning, the story and its characters became more to readers, listening to the author, due to its movie adaptation. Beyond merely a tale of two Wyoming cowboys.

title brokeback mountain

Ms. Proulx essentially wrote a modern parable as personified in the recognizable likes of the cowboys many of us as readers and movie-goers grew up with over the years. The legendary taciturn individuals steeled against any hardship, be it on the prairie or mountain top. Certainly, upholding the cost of not whining to anybody, if they had ’em. Coming to terms with the extreme and irrational reactions that same life may have indirectly fostered.

And Ang Lee filmed it…heartbreakingly and beautifully, I might add.

The Wedding Banquet, Eat Drink Man Woman, Sense and Sensibility, The Ice Storm, and Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon.

220px-Ang_Lee_-_66ème_Festival_de_Venise_(Mostra)The Taiwanese-born American director initially may have seemed an atypical selection for a saga of a pair of cowpokes. Yes, a case could be made for what was essentially a contentious wrinkle in the telling of a contemporary American Western. One that involves human passion (in all its forms), as well as family (equally in all its good and bad elements). It then becomes clear Ang Lee was well-versed for this given his diverse filmography. Ideal, really.

Much like Ms. Proulx’s story, this lingers. No doubt benefitting from a supreme translation of the concise material to the screen care of the noted western-scribe Larry McMurtry and Diana Ossana1. The masterful language of the author, and her fierce love of her former home state, coming across with each scene and sensation. Evident in the breathtaking views Ang and his DP Rodrigo Prieto brought2 (Canadian locations standing in for Wyoming).

Alongside the familiar loneliness and quick violence of this traditional genre.

Yet, it’s that conventionality which was turned on its head by the tale’s two leads, the late-Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal as Ennis and Jack3, respectively. Two very masculine lovers. Back in ’05, the film’s release elicited a number viewers, writers, and critics to chime in on the subject at hand. A favorite being Stephen Hunter’s piece for the Washington Post, Out in the West: Reexamining A Genre Saddled With Subtext.

“In fact, what’s remarkable about “Brokeback Mountain” is merely that for possibly the first time, homoeroticism is the text, not the subtext. But it’s not like homosexuality has been unknown in the western. Like any art form, the oater represents not only the conscious of its creators, but also their subconscious.”

The article citing three of my all-time favorites, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, The Wild Bunch, and Red River, in fact. Even Anthony Mann’s Bend in the River, “…one of five “psychological” westerns Mann and Stewart made together from ’50 to ’55”, gathered new meaning. Still others went on to discuss or dissect homosexuality, bi-sexuality (each of our heroes having wives and children), and the close bond between straight male friends as a result of “Brokeback.”

brokeback-mountain-ennis-jack

All well and fine. We each are going to interpret the story of the 20-year affair between two men, out west, in our own way. Straight, gay, and every thing in-between will construe it as they see fit. Proulx having to deal with the success of Brokeback Mountain as a film with fans desperately wanting (and submitting) Hollywood endings for the star-crossed lovers Ennis and (especially) Jack. It’s that kind of movie. One that tears (as in torn), and tears (as eyes misting over).

One with an extraordinary cast, too. Surely, the aforementioned leads. Michelle Williams and Anne Hathaway the women in the background as Ennis’ wife Ana and Jack’s Lureen, not taking backseat to anyone whenever they’re on-screen. Randy Quaid his usual colorful self (before falling off the deep end of late), delivering Proulx’s “stem the rose” line as only he could. Every little character in this only added to the sublime stew.

Cooking in a boatload of local flavor, and unexpected tenderness.

It’s easy to spot the author’s driving concern though, which the filmmakers took care to translate, I think. Not so much about homosexuality, but homophobia. In no uncertain terms. The death of Matthew Shepard in 1998 a year after the short story’s publication propelled the point further. Indeed, the lines between men and women, and their roles, already crisply drawn, especially in Wyoming by ’63, long overdue for an overhaul.

Even if you’re aware of the old joke4.

Ennis: “We can get together… once in a while, way the hell out in the middle of nowhere, but…”
Jack: “Once in a while? Every four fuckin’ years?”
Ennis: “If you can’t fix it, Jack, you gotta stand it.”
Jack: “For how long?”
Ennis: “For as long as we can ride it. There ain’t no reins on this one.”

Brokeback-Mountain-brokeback-mountain-4481612-1020-576

Brokeback Mountain carries another haunting aspect. The untitled “Best Picture” for that movie year. Many thinking it deserved the Oscar5 instead of Crash — Ang Lee thankfully taking home Best Director. I’ve little doubt many of the older contingent in The Academy felt uncomfortable in voting for a film carrying the label as “the gay western” on its saddlebags, which is a sad statement revealing hangups even in this day and age.

The author and filmmakers constructed a story that further broke barriers, which long ago needed breaking, with this. Its multi-dimensional cast, plot, and storyline in keeping with the Stanley Kramer-style of bringing attention to social issues most studios avoided. A poignant film taking a tried and true genre format beyond a circumscribe scale. Making us realize it’s another very human tale on the frontier.

The good, the bad, and the ugly as an epic, passionate ode.

Beyond breaking ground, Brokeback remains a classic tale of heartbreak. Ennis and Jack inexorably drawn to each other. Whether through their proximity in the rough environs of Wyoming, or the sheer loneliness of their way of life. Although, the western does manage to sneak in its small acts of devotion out on the trail, it’s those familiar emotional and physical bonds that’ll bring them together. Break them apart, too.

The time-honored tale of tragic love, in other words — and it doesn’t get much more conventional than that.


Parallel Post Series

  1.  McMurtry handled the marital dramas and the Western elements, while Ossana concentrated on the male relationship, McMurtry feeling that he was not up to the task of conveying that realistically ~ IMDB 
  2. Note the fireworks scene with Ennis and Ana, which shared a similar framing device by Benoît Delhomme in The Theory of Everything
  3.  Among the actors considered for the male leads were Josh HartnettColin FarrellMatt DamonBilly Crudup, and Ben Affleck ~ IMDB 
  4. “Wyoming — where men are men, women are scarce, and the sheep are nervous.” 
  5. Personally, I also enjoyed Crash and thought it a solid film that had something important to say. YMMV. 
Advertisements

35 Responses to “Brokeback Mountain Film Review”

  1. Arlee Bird

    Haven’t seen this film and most likely won’t . There are too many other films that I’d rather see and it’s unlikely that I’d ever get around to seeing Brokeback Mountain unless my life became one of watching 3 or more movies every single day.

    Arlee Bird
    A to Z Challenge Co-host
    Tossing It Out

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  2. Mark Walker

    Great piece! It’s been so long since I seen this but, I too, reckon it should have won the best picture Oscar. The “gay western” tag it’s received is very unfair to the film and undermines it somegwhat. There’s certainly no other western like it in my memory but is that not the type of filmmaking we should be encouraging, rather than labelling? It’s a wonderful film and a very heartfelt love story.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  3. Dan O.

    I tell everybody who wants to know about this, to watch it. It’s one of the best films of the past decade and works, regardless of if you’re gay or not. Good review.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  4. Cindy Bruchman

    I think its a beautiful film and while I suppose the tag of it being a gay film turns some people off, they are missing out on a wonderful love story and the beautiful cinematography. Forbidden love is sad. Both actors were marvelous.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    • le0pard13

      We’re in agreement. And it stands the test of time. Hard to believe ten years have flashed by since its release. Thanks so much, Cindy.

      Like

      Reply
    • le0pard13

      It’s one of those films (if they weren’t familiar with the short story) many came in with a preconceived mindset, I reckon. A rare film where by the end credits you weren’t the same as when you entered. Stunning, indeed. Thanks, Abbi. 🙂

      Like

      Reply
  5. fernandorafael

    Great review. You know, this had almost no impact on me when I watched it (except for the shirt scene and Michelle Williams discovering the truth about her husband). Granted, I was 15 years old. This definitely calls for another watch.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    • le0pard13

      Oh, yes. Thanks for the read and comment, Fernando. As well as for sharing that, my friend.

      p.s., will you be making your way up to this year’s TCM Film Fest later in March?

      Like

      Reply
  6. Rachel

    Wonderful review, Michael! So glad you enjoy this one as much as I do. It is a truly exceptional film. I didn’t see it for years for the simple fact that I’m not a huge Ang Lee fan (Crouching Tiger being the notable exception); but I love the quartet of actors so much that I finally gave in. And then was so mad at myself for avoiding it for so long. Absolutely stunning. And even though Lee tends to have a directing style that doesn’t fit my taste there is no doubt that he can elicit incredible performances from his actors. Even the smallest moments aren’t left to chance. There is the film and emotions that he presents and then there’s the subtext that is always there. His actors always say as much when not speaking as when they are. I think he was the perfect choice to adapt this story as there is so much going on between the lines. He’s the one to bring that out.

    If this is called a gay western does that mean all the others have to be called straight westerns? wtf does that shit even mean? Glad to see so much impatience with meaningless labels.

    I like how we both came by that same quote of the author’s. I had some thoughts on it but decided not to share them within the context of the review (just wanted to talk about how much I loved it:)) but I’ll probably comment over at my blog about it. Short version: I have no patience for artists who resent their art being consumed. I was reminded quite a bit of Kurt Cobain and Bill Watterson.

    So glad to have done this one. Maybe next Feb we can find an epic romance with a happy ending. 🙂

    Happy Anniversary!!!!

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    • le0pard13

      Indeed, this is an exceptional film. Interesting that Ang isn’t a ready favorite of yours. His take of family, in all forms, is a hallmark of his work. Yeah, this quartet of actors was exceptional.

      The unfortunate labelling by some when this came out didn’t help. I remember reading some comments and articles that used it in some context or another. And you’re right. What does it really mean. It’s a waste, meant to shutdown discussion.

      Yeah, maybe another epic romance for next Feb. Thanks so much for this pick, splendid comment, and the anniversary wishes, Rachel. 🙂

      Like

      Reply
      • Rachel

        I don’t think I’ve turned my computer on but once since we posted these reviews!!! Still adjusting to kiwi horse ownership so time management has taken a hit. Anyway, wanted to let you know I’ve finally replied over in my comments. 🙂

        Like

        Reply

Are you talkin’ to me?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: