Still more lazy thoughts from this one…

Givin’ Out Wings 1: It’s a Wonderful Harvest, or The Ice Life

“As Wichita Falls… So Falls Wichita Falls.”

As I come up on the Yuletide, my common practice of watching seasonal fare is in its usual swing. However, in the last few years, I seem to be seeking a balance of light and dark wares whenever I am hip deep in Scotch tape and gift wrap, or the paper cuts that come in-between opening Christmas cards. For every viewing of The Santa Clause, I want to throw in Bad Santa. Have a jones for White Christmas? Then, I want Die Hard or a fave of Joel and I, The Long Kiss Goodnight, on the docket, too.

And when I think of one of my all-time favorite films, one done by the great Frank Capra, my mind wonders over to its antithesis, the Harold Ramis directed The Ice Harvest from 2005. Ah, I see the doubt on your face. Fair warning, some of the plot points for both films are revealed in this two-parter post. If you haven’t seen either, and don’t wish to have your fun spoiled, it’d be best to take in the films first. For the rest of you, I’ll just assume you’ve seen both, or are at least aware of the quintessential Capra film, and I’ll try to convince you I’m not schizophrenic. 😉

“Christmas Eve. Ho, ho, f*ckin’, ho.”

There is a fair bit of discord among book readers and noir aficionados concerning the film adaptation of Scott Phillips’ début novel. The hard-boiled classic, The Ice Harvest. To say the fans of the novel hate the film would be an understatement. Fair enough. However, the bitterly and darkly funny tale adapted to the screen, I contend, purposely hijacked the story’s premise and its Christmas season setting and aimed it directly at a particularly American cinema classic and holiday staple.

In my opinion, the neo-noir The Ice Harvest is really It’s a Wonderful Life for our time (at least for those of who’ve lived through the sub-prime mortgage crisis). In this case, the film is in wolf’s clothing. Keep in mind, too, IaWL is not just the “uplifting, heart-warming, holiday tale” as movie critic A.O. Scott initially recalled in his setup for his Critic’s Pick video from some years back. He followed that sentence up with another, very different, observation:

“… it’s a dark, disturbing fable about greed, exploitation, misery, and disappointment.”

For the 21st century, I believe Charlie Arglist is in point of fact our version of George Bailey, just transplanted from Bedford Falls to Wichita, Kans-as[s] (as his buddy, Peter Van Heuten drunkenly pronounces for his mob-lawyer pal). The clue here is the hat at the start (and the only time he wears it in the film). That intro of Charlie offers him adorned with a similar fedora as worn by George. And both characters have dates of reckoning come their era’s Christmas Eve.

The fact that TIH has John Cusack as the lead should be the next clue about the connection the movies share. I’ve always thought that if there is an actor today that epitomizes the same everyday man-role Jimmy Stewart was known for (no less so than in IaWL), it’s Cusack. In the case of The Ice Harvest, this would be the George Bailey that took Potter’s offer for a job seriously, and ran with it. Think of Charlie Sheen’s Bud Fox from last year’s Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps for a similar betrayal. In other words, screw ‘the Building and Loan’. All of those smarts now play for the other team instead of the downtrodden but close community of Bedford Falls.

You only get close in Wichita if you want to slit someone’s throat.

“Only morons are nice at Christmas.”

Of course, taking Mephisto’s offer not only buys you the dark suit, the black shirt, and the red tie (Charlie’s wardrobe for the film is nothing if not the classic Armani-gangster look as one can get for a mobbed-up attorney), but also enough self-hatred and misery to fuel our protagonist’s desperation to get out of the corrupt town he finds himself in — something George always strived for in It’s a Wonderful Life. It’s George’s lot to never achieve exit from Bedford Falls. But, the parallel and foils don’t stop there.

A good many of the characters from Capra’s classic are transferred over; in likewise twisted form, at that. Mary, the dedicated spouse of George who is the abiding strength of their family is turned into Charlie’s ex-wife. The “cold, grasping, hypocritical bitch”, Sarabeth (and soon to be the ex-wife of his bud, Pete). Old man Potter would be Bill Guerrard (the always underrated Randy Quaid), here. Charlie’s mob-boss. If you listen closely to their respective dialogues, they espouse the same cold-eyed pragmatism that cuts through to the truth of the matter in both stories. They’re essentially the same men — they’re just from different rackets.

“Vic, I sue people for a living. You sell them pornography. Roy, hurts people. He makes it so their knees and elbows bend in both directions. That worries me.”

The sexy Violet Bick, done ever so well by the film noir legend Gloria Grahame in IaWL, is represented here by Renata Crest (Connie Nielsen). The femme fatale strip club owner who is in cahoots with the Ernie Bishop counterpart, the pornographer Vic Cavanaugh (Billy Bob Thornton) to skim $2 million from the mob. The only reason any of it comes to pass is that she behind the scene pairs Charlie’s brains with Vic’s bal… well, you know what I mean.

The good cop Bert? He’d be the mob enforcer, Roy Gelles (Mike Starr, who seems to have made a living portraying mob muscle on the screen). And who is the angel Clarence in The Ice Harvest, you ask? Believe it or not, I say it’s the drunken Pete (played marvelously by Oliver Platt). Really. Watch the film and you’ll see he’s the only one that tells Mr. Arglist the truth throughout the entire movie. It’s sad, ugly truth. But hey, it’s neo noir. He’s the only real friend the guy has in wintry Wichita.

Whenever Pete is by our anti-hero’s side in the tale, Charlie has no choice but to take his life into account. Again, the continuing analog between the two tales. Charlie’s less than stellar guardian angel takes hits right along with him, too — just ask that one male body part, which takes a jolting journey, if that’s not true. While George Bailey has a life of regrets in It’s a Wonderful Life, Charlie Arglist’s general outlook is very much in stark contrast:

“It’s futile to regret.”

While It’s a Wonderful Life spent a good bit of its running time building its main character’s back story, The Ice Harvest concentrates its scant 90 minutes on the reckoning and revelations of that one critical Christmas Eve. Any background details are quickly filled in by Charlie and Pete along way to the final accounting and the hard-boiled mayhem set to arrive like the ghost of Christmas Future. Still, nothing says soul-searching like these two films; they just go about it differently.

Where George contemplates suicide at a bridge overlooking a freezing river to solve his plight, Charlie merely throws up at his overpass. Yes, things (or holiday movies) don’t get much darker than this film (or as grimly funny). But, this modern mystery crime noir, with an air of jaundice, still maintains an unmistakable Christmas theme. It was unfairly dismissed back in ’05 by critics and audiences — much like those did in 1946 with Frank Capra’s masterwork.

2005_the_ice_harvest

However, I can assure you that Harold Ramis’ tenth film is fast building a following for all of this Christmassy tumult. Based and adapted from said Scott Phillips novel by writers Robert Benton and Richard Russo, it has joined the darker fare offered up for the season, and I’m more than happy to welcome it. “But wait!”, you say. Where is the comparable ‘chance to see what the world would be like without you’ moment in this? Well, my friends, I assure you the premise is there.

It is implicit in the film’s ending, the exact same one the book’s fans despise for its divergent upbeat conclusion. In this circumstance, Charlie Arglist takes the alternative offered him… on his way out of Wichita, the place that has become his Pottersville. He leaves it, along with all those dead bodies left behind, and with all that cash. Just like those who gave us the credit default swap, he gets away clean. And it’s for that reason, I argue The Ice Harvest is an amazing film for our time — or maybe, because of it.

Pete: [waking up in back of Charlie’s car] “Ugh… Where are we?”
Charlie: “We’re in heaven, Pete.”
Pete: “Oh… They got pancakes?”
Charlie: “They got everything.”
Pete: “Good.”


Next: we’ll turn back to the light.

Advertisements

16 Responses to “Givin’ Out Wings 1: It’s a Wonderful Harvest, or The Ice Life”

  1. Jen Forbus

    I’m always amazed at your film knowledge and how easily you convey it and analyze it. Someone should be snatching you up as a movie critic! 😉 Happy Holidays, my friend!

    Like

    Reply
  2. J.D.

    Nice comparison! Love both films. THE ICE HARVEST is a really interesting neo noir. Never read the book but I quite enjoyed the film and all the twists and turns. Would never have thought of the parallels to IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE but you’ve got me convinced! Good stuff, my friend.

    Like

    Reply
  3. Scott Lawlor

    Brilliant!!

    I have not seen this, or have I even heard of it (ooh the shame). But I love It’s a Wonderful Life. In fact I am doing a post about it today.

    Thanks for this, I need to hunt this down

    Like

    Reply
    • le0pard13

      Very kind of you to say, Scott. If you enjoy crime noir, then something like this (with its distinct Christmas theme that gives it quite the contrast) may be to your liking. Either way, I’d love to hear your thoughts about it.

      I can’t get enough of ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ so I’ll definitely be heading over to your site to read your post on the film. Many thanks.

      Like

      Reply
  4. rtm

    I’ve never even heard of this but this line got me intrigued “…The Ice Harvest is really It’s a Wonderful Life for our time” I like Connie Nielsen, I’ve always wondered why she’s not starring in more movies. Great write-up, my friend!

    Like

    Reply
    • le0pard13

      This one has some great dialogue, along with some jaw-dropping scenes, with an unexpected Yuletide tinge to it all. It is definitely in the ‘Xmas-alternative’ class, Ruth. But, the IaWL undertone is there, I believe. Many thanks, Ruth (and Sunday’s Movie Talk on Sunday on Twitter, #MTOS, was really fun and tailor-made for the season).

      Like

      Reply
  5. Dan

    I’d like to echo Jen’s comments – such a wonderful piece of writing and your observations are great (interesting, perceptive, well written). I love the comparison between It’s A Wonderful Life and The Ice Harvest and I’m left wondering if I should have included the film in my Christmas coverage…

    …I watched Bad Santa last night as part of my continuing Christmas film selection. I really do think that film gets better. I rated it as the best of the 2000s and there’s no doubt in my mind that it is. I was thinking as I was watching last night that the film was too dark to truly embody the sort of sentimentalism and innocent spirit we see in Christmas films that become widely loved. But I think that does the film a disservice. It is darkly comic and suitably risque but the relationship between Thornton and the kid is what Christmas should be about and its what other films convey in a much more matter-of-fact and predictable way.

    Like

    Reply
    • le0pard13

      Thanks very much, Dan. And you’re right. The razor-edged ‘Bad Santa’ only gets better on later screenings. I find it most interesting that it and ‘The Ice Harvest’ both feature Billy Bob Thornton at his wickedly yuletide best. BBT and the kid really do make quite a pair in ‘Bad Santa’ and Christmas. Great point.

      Like

      Reply
  6. John Greco

    Terrific comparison Michael! It never occurred to me. I have always saw a dark side to Capra’s IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE, that’s about as far as I got. As you know, I am a big fan of THE ICE HARVEST ever since I originally say back in ’05. Along with Ramis, I think credit needs to be given to screenwriters Benton and Russo. I am going to have to order the book!

    Like

    Reply
    • le0pard13

      Thank you, John. And you’re quite right about giving screenwriters Benton and Russo, along with Ramis, their due for this wonderful film adaptation.

      Like

      Reply

Are you talkin’ to me?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: