Still more lazy thoughts from this one…

Free Fall Film Review

With the upcoming L.A. Times Festival of Books right around the corner, it means springtime is here in the southland. No wonder I feel so freakin’ poorly now. My allergies are making life the other side of miserable (the plentiful winter rains all but guaranteed a bumper pollen crop for us Angelenos). Los Angeles weather, while it can be wonderful, is equally unpredictable, at times. Especially as it settles into a new season. Last weekend has been cool, even misty — this week the 80s will be back. But I digress…

Once again, it’s time for the blogger otherwise known as the Scientist Gone Wordy and I to add another of our duo posts in the series we started last year. This time, we took advantage of the book fest timing and a novel/film pairing many of us ‘Craisies’ hold in cringing affection. As usual, the wordy one will look at the text of a famed novel later adapted to film, which I will review. In this case, she’ll be looking at the 1993 source crime novel and Edgar Award nominee from famed author Robert Crais for the 1997 film adaptation, Free Fall. Rachel’s book review can be found here:

Free Fall by Robert Crais

A brief synopsis of the film: Elvis Cole is back! While the L.A. private detective still hasn’t unpacked his bags from his earlier New York escapade, he drops by his West Hollywood workplace to pick up the load of old mail that’s piled up. There, a tentative young woman appears at his office door looking for a savior. Jennifer Sheridan wants Elvis to investigate what’s troubling her fiancé, a plainclothes LAPD officer working for an elite gang unit. She’s convinced something is wrong and that he’s in danger, and won’t accept the circumstantial evidence that her high school sweetheart is having a dalliance with another woman. What Elvis, and his laconic partner Joe Pike, find in this probe will put them up against corrupt cops, a lethal street gang, and murder charges.

[spoiler warning: some key elements of the film could be revealed in this review]

Where do you begin with a film like this? Yes, it’s got all the expected trappings of a notable film franchise: good-looking Hollywood actors portraying now well-known literary figures (Robert Crais has seen to that through his novel series), famous Los Angeles locations, and a story that takes into account some real law enforcement history in LaLa Land circa mid-90s. However, since this was essentially one of the first re-boot‘s ever of a failing film series, I don’t think you can review this picture without some perspective to what’s come before. When Michael Connelly rolls his eyes when asked about that now infamous third film flame-out of his friend’s series (his release of The Lincoln Lawyer adaptation notwithstanding), you know things must have gotten pretty out-of-hand.

Back in ’87, Robert Crais’ debut novel, The Monkey’s Raincoat, made a splash on the mystery book scene. But, only when his second novel arrived, Stalking the Angel, helping to establish his character’s popularity in 1989, did studios came a callin’. Given the author’s history as a contract writer (Hill Street Blues, Cagney & Lacey, and Miami Vice, among others) and TV producer, he was hesitant to option his characters to any Hollywood studio. Then that horse’s head in the bed incident was reported in The Star, and the rest was history. ‘Option’ City, baby! The film adaptation for The Monkey’s Raincoat was a surprise hit in early Spring 1991, with Kurt Russell and Sam Elliott grabbing everyone’s attention as Elvis Cole and Joe Pike, respectively (some say their later re-pairing for 1993’s Tombstone was credited to that earlier film).

The studio quickly ramped up the production of the next novel in the series for a 1993 release. Kurt and Sam were lined up again for the sequel, this time producers re-titled the second adaptation Stalking the Yakuza (heavens yes, we all know films involving Japanese organized crime in L.A. always works). It produced similar box office in the Fall of that year. However, trouble was brewing (if you go with what the tabloids were writing at the time). “Joe’s got a bigger gun than I do.“, this and, “Cole gets more lines.“, that. Typical. And since Hollywood bigwigs thought they could easily re-equip this ‘buddy team’ for a big summer release, as they usually do, studio execs began making changes. Out went the then little known director (Curtis Hanson), along with author Crais as co-producer, plus the feuding leads. In came Joel Schumacher (who, years later, would be entrusted with ruining continuing Tim Burton’s Batman franchise) to write/direct, along with two new lead performers, for the third movie.

The next novel in the series, 1992’s Lullaby Town, was re-christened New York Dreams (?!?) for the 1995 adaptation, not to mention Robert Downey, Jr. and Val Kilmer lined up as the new Elvis and Joe. To say it was an unmitigated disaster would be kind. Let’s express it another way. The depth-charge this calamitous production turned out to be, and how the movie laid waste to Robert Crais’ characters, caused almost the same amount of fan venom as was directed toward Brett Ratner and his destruction upon the X-Men series. What had to be the most lasting and hated symbol for Crais aficionados for this ill-conceived hubris was this shocking revelation from the film: Joe Pike’s nipple ring. It still makes my head hurt to envision it. Although, to be fair, Downey and Kilmer did exhibit some rapport in their short-lived stint together:

So with that, we come to the notorious re-boot and Free Fall. Obviously, the new filmmakers (this time the French, since they’ll make any crime novel U.S. film producers won’t touch) desperately wanted to return to what worked before. Well, almost. Newly hired William Friedkin (replacing Phil Kaufman, and at the time attempting to rebound his directorial career from his post-David Caruso, Jade film period) rose to the challenge. He even found a way to inject an exciting car chase through downtown L.A. into the story (though it wasn’t in the original novel). Oh, well. That stunt sequence remains spectacularly thrilling and the best thing in the film, however. The more austere film budget, besides, necessitated the real controversy to come out of this restart venture. Meaning, Eric Roberts as Elvis Cole and Jeff Fahey as Joe Pike. I know it sounds like something made for a direct-to-video release, but it was better than you’d expect from that duo.

As well, the noted film writer John Milius performed a decent job at a tailoring this Elvis & Joe novel to the screen. Though, as my friend Corey Wilde once described, “the early books, [are] full of a wisecracking Elvis and deadpan – and deadly – Joe Pike” plotting, the fourth novel’s look at L.A. inner-city crime and police corruption during the tempestuous 90s was perceptive in its observations and writing, nonetheless. Free Fall has been underrated by some crime novel fans or thought of as just simple genre entertainment by other readers. Coming back to it more than once, though, shows it’s more than that. At least, for me. Milius held to most of the novel’s storyline in his script. It should be noted, director Ron Shelton would mine similar ground, using a James Ellroy story, with his criminally undervalued Dark Blue film in 2002 — ironically, starring the first (and still the best, IMO) Elvis Cole, Kurt Russell. Along with Ving Rhames, who co-starred as Ray Depende in this film.

Ultimately, was Free Fall a good film? Given what Hollywood often does to the source material in fashioning a book to film — I mean, who’s inane idea was it to change Elvis’ ill-tempered cat to some flatulent pot belly pig, anyhow? — it can be a mixed blessing at best. As it was here. Most would think having Elvis Cole and Joe Pike in the movies would be a good thing. Given the results though, I’d say this film is a good example of what can come of a prized book series reworked to motion pictures. Most of the time, the characters and stories transform into something different entirely for filmmakers (and audiences) than what the readers have come to know, and cherish. It’s rare the author’s original story concept or spirit remains intact. But, who am I to judge? And, who can blame the novelist for giving in to a boatload of money and optioning his series? Because of this, I hear Mr. Crais has since relocated to Santa Catalina Island and now works with his unofficial charity, the Albacore Club, in between writing his next novel.

Now, just don’t get me started on the casting of Lucy Chenier in that Voodoo River film monstrosity…

Bloggers note: if you haven’t figured it out yet, this review is entirely a work of fiction (and a creative way of naming many of my film favorites… and a couple of my movie scoundrels). I credit my partner Rachel for suggesting it as an amusing way to apply the novel/film post dynamic to a Robert Crais novel that’s never been re-worked for film. In real life, as Wikipedia observes,

“Crais refuses to sell the rights to Cole, Pike, and his other recurring characters, preferring to allow his readers to keep their own personal conceptions of the characters.”

And we, his fans, are thankful for that.

Parallel Post Series

28 Responses to “Free Fall Film Review”

  1. Naomi Johnson

    This film series was so bad (Joe Pike & nipple ring? Woof.) and yet somehow you found good things to say about it. You’re a nicer man than I, Gunga Din. I’ll be honest and say that I didn’t even bother with the FREE FALL installment. Fahey is best known, to me at least, as THE LAWNMOWER MAN. ‘Nuff said, right there. I still love the books but even now I sometimes get a glimpse of Russell and Kilmer when I’m re-reading LA REQUIEM and I have to close the book quickly. Eww.

    Are you kidding about Lucy Chenier? Hahahahaha! I thought she got just the casting she deserved. You notice how Crais toned her down some in the books after that film came out. If only he had listened to me all those years ago.

    OK, joshing aside. Michael, this was hilarious. You almost had me believing I’d missed out on the series, and then you had me glad that Crais has stood by his word of no film adaptations.

    Although I do like the idea of Ving Rhames as Ray Depende…

    • le0pard13

      Hehe. Good one, Naomi. Yeah, it was surprisingly easy to imagine how Hollywood studio execs could potentially screw up film adaptations for this series. Ving Rhames as Ray Depende was my final add to the post, too. Thanks so much, Naomi.

  2. Novroz

    This is very interesting…I honestly thought that it was a real review. You are REALLY creative!! wow. I can imagine how hard it is to write something like this.

    I have never heard of Robert Crais before,the story sounds good and worth checking.

    • le0pard13

      Author Robert Crais wrote for a good many of my favorite TV series awhile back. But, I didn’t get hooked into the Elvis Cole/Joe Pike till this century in the 00’s. If you enjoy crime/mystery fare and/or some unique character byplay and emotion, then I recommend it. Thanks for the kind words and comment, Novroz.

  3. dirtywithclass

    I honestly thought this was a real review at first…you clever man you.

    I’ve never had a book that i liked turned into a movie or tv series before(Actually, the Vampire Academy movie will be the first time that a book i liked has been turned into movie)

    • le0pard13

      You’re very kind, my friend. When favorite books get turned into film, there’s a built-in investment for the reader. I hope the filmmakers do the novel proud, dwc. Thank you very much.

  4. Rachel

    Awe, and might I add, some!

    Just too wonderful for words! I about died at the nipple ring part. Gots to run out the door for now but more comments coming!

    • le0pard13

      Yeah, I don’t know where in the recesses of mind that came from. But, glad you and my wife got a kick out of it. Thanks.

      • Christine McCann

        hehe Yes, when it came to the nipple ring, I wondered what would be more likely: Joe Pike giving you one of his lip-twitch smiles or drawing down on you with his gun?

  5. Pop Culture Nerd

    I’ve always been impressed by how insightful your reviews are, how you manage to catch details that others miss, how much backstory you know about it, etc., but I’m bowled over by how you’ve managed to be just as sharp and discerning about a movie that doesn’t exist!

    Very clever and funny, Michael. And kudos to Rachel for suggesting the idea.

    • le0pard13

      Thank you so much, Elyse. I also thank and appreciate Rachel for coming up with this imaginative endeavor and you for the inspiration and feedback that helped make it possible.

  6. Christine McCann

    Hahaha! Oh, SO well done, Michael! Off to read Rachel’s now.

  7. Rachel

    There is so much awesome here that it’s hard to know where to start but I guess I’m gonna have to start with that poster! I’m amazed at how reflective it is of the source material (cough) but I do feel a certain sleeveless sweatshirt is missing.

    Excellent imaging of what it would take to get RC to let his “baby” out into the wilds of Hollywood. ha!

    Bickering stars, nipple rings, New York Dreams! *snicker*

    Question – What is more unlikely: A nipple ring or Pike actually saying as many words as seen in the (really great) scene you included of Downey, Jr and Kilmer*?

    Michael, I figured I’d have so much fun reading what you came up with but this so far exceeded my expectations that I’m totally blown away! Thanks so much for doing this and giving me some great laughs! (And a few films to add to my list)

    *Val Kilmer was my teenage celebrity crush. I never have been able to lose my sentimental fan love for him (despite some questionable film choices over the last few years:).

    • le0pard13

      Thanks so very much, Rachel. Kudos to you for coming up with this idea. I was stumped there for awhile, but things started falling into place somehow. That poster for one… it’s from a real and not-so-good movie… and re-listening to the audiobook for another, somehow jumpstarted me into imagining the cast and what not.

      Yeah, that’s a hard question to answer. The nipple ring or that discourse from Joe. But, they’re perfect for how someone could screw-up Pike on film ;-).

      Val Kilmer is also a fave actor of mine. Yeah he’s been in some odd films over the years, but he’s rarely boring.

  8. rtm

    For some reason the font on your blog is unreadable on Firefox and Safari at work, so I have to read your stuff at home, Michael. Thought I’d let you know.

    • le0pard13

      Interesting… On my Mac at work, for me, the blog site does render okay on Firefox (3.6.6 and 4) and Safari 5.0.5. When I looked at Firefox on my PC (v.3.6.7), though, the text does seemed fainter and a little harder to read (I should let the WP theme developer I’m using know about this, though). Perhaps, if you’re on a Mac, try flushing the web cache and see if that helps. Either way, thanks very much for the heads up.

      • rtm

        No it’s not that it’s faint, it just switch into a weird character font, so it’s probably just the font mgmt system at work because at home it’s totally fine.


Are you talkin’ to me?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,749 other followers

%d bloggers like this: